Maharashtra appoints 12 officers to speed up Rs 912 crore MahaRERA recovery for buyers

The appointments, made under district collectors in six key districts, are intended to accelerate the compensation process under provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

About The Author

  • Related Posts

    NeoLiv sells 263 residential plots for over ₹300 crore in Haryana

    Mumbai-based NeoLiv, a fund-led real estate developer, has sold 263 plots in its first housing project in Haryana, generating sales worth over ₹300 crore

    Mumbai ranks 6th globally in under-construction data centre capacity, surpassing London and Dublin: Report

    While Mumbai is ranked 6th globally in under-construction data centre capacity, Pune and Bengaluru are ranked 4th and 5th among APAC’s emerging data center hubs

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    India Can Talk To Pak If It Takes Action Against Terrorism: Shashi Tharoor

    • 2 views
    India Can Talk To Pak If It Takes Action Against Terrorism: Shashi Tharoor

    US Steel, Aluminum Tariff Hikes To Take Effect From Today

    • 2 views
    US Steel, Aluminum Tariff Hikes To Take Effect From Today

    कुलपति नियुक्ति कानून पर अंतरिम रोक के खिलाफ तमिलनाडु सरकार पहुंची सुप्रीम कोर्ट

    • 3 views
    कुलपति नियुक्ति कानून पर अंतरिम रोक के खिलाफ तमिलनाडु सरकार पहुंची सुप्रीम कोर्ट

    कुलपति नियुक्ति कानून पर अंतरिम रोक के खिलाफ तमिलनाडु सरकार पहुंची सुप्रीम कोर्ट

    • 3 views
    कुलपति नियुक्ति कानून पर अंतरिम रोक के खिलाफ तमिलनाडु सरकार पहुंची सुप्रीम कोर्ट

    Khan Sir Reception Exclusive Inside Video Wife Face: KD Campus Neetu Mam, Physics wallah पहुंचे

    • 3 views
    Khan Sir Reception Exclusive Inside Video Wife Face: KD Campus Neetu Mam, Physics wallah पहुंचे

    Aligarh Mob Lynching Update News: UP के फेमस IPS हैं Hindu Mahasabha से भिड़ने वाले SSP Sanjiv Suman

    • 3 views
    Aligarh Mob Lynching Update News: UP के फेमस IPS हैं Hindu Mahasabha से भिड़ने वाले SSP Sanjiv Suman